Pensions: Tax Overpayment Of £1bn Prompts Reform Call
People who have flexibly withdrawn pension savings have collectively, temporarily, overpaid more than £1bn in tax, new figures show.
Pensioners are initially charged an emergency tax code after taking money from their pension pot, before having to wait for a refund from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).
Another £160m was repaid last year, so the total since 2015 has topped £1bn.
Pensions experts have called for the system to be reformed.
"This is an absolute disgrace. A system based on systematic over-taxing of pension savers cannot be right," said Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister and now a partner at consultants LCP.
"There is no good reason why citizens who access their pension should have to go through the hassle of claiming back excess taxation which they should never have had to pay in the first place."
Years of overpayments
Changes to the pension system in 2015 allowed people to withdraw some of their defined contribution pension savings as an income from the age of 55, while leaving the remainder invested.
In doing so, some are charged at an emergency tax rate, which means they could temporarily pay thousands of pound more in tax than they actually owe.
To reclaim the overpaid tax, they need to complete one of three HMRC forms, which should mean money is returned within 30 days.
If they fail to do so, then they rely on HMRC reviewing the payments, possible after receiving a self-assessment tax return, and making a refund. The tax authority will work out their annual tax bill at the end of the tax year as part of the usual reconciliation exercise.
Sir Steve said that, although people would not be permanently out of pocket, it could be many months before someone's financial situation was corrected.
How to claim back the overpaid tax
The form you need to fill out will depend on how you have accessed your retirement pot:
- If you have emptied your pot by flexibly accessing your pension and are still working or receiving benefits, you should fill out form P53Z
- When you have emptied a pot by flexibly accessing your pension and are not working or receiving benefits, you should fill out form P50Z
- If you have only flexibly accessed part of your pension pot, then use form P55
The forms and online service can be found via the gov.uk website.
More independent information and guidance about pensions is available from Pension Wise.
Calls for reform
The latest HMRC figures show that more than £48m was repaid to 15,856 people in overpaid tax on flexible withdrawals in the first three months of the year. Although the tax system differs in Scotland, the same scenario could arise.
The ongoing situation should be changed, according to those in the pension sector.
"It is a scandal that government has failed to adapt the tax system to cope with the fact Britons are able to access their pensions flexibly from the age of 55, instead persisting with an arcane approach which hits people with an unfair tax bill, often running into thousands of pounds," said Tom Selby, from investment platform AJ Bell.
Andrew Tully, technical director at pensions firm Canada Life, said "a better way" needed to be found, but said the current system allowed for a workaround for some people.
"A good tip for those customers making a pension withdrawal for the first time, is to initiate a small withdrawal of say £100. That will generate a tax code from HMRC which the pension provider will apply to any subsequent withdrawals," he said.
"That will result in the tax being taken at source being far more accurate in many more cases, not only reducing the burden of paperwork but equally importantly the customer receiving a more accurate withdrawal in the first place."
A spokesman for HMRC said: "Nobody overpays tax as a result of taking advantage of pension flexibility. We will automatically repay anyone who pays too much because they are on an emergency tax code. Individuals can claim back any overpayment earlier if they wish."
The tax authority said that the alternative - for some people to pay too little tax and then be pursued for the money - would be undesirable and inappropriate if people had a relatively low income.
From Chip War To Cloud War: The Next Frontier In Global Tech Competition
The global chip war, characterized by intense competition among nations and corporations for supremacy in semiconductor ... Read more
The High Stakes Of Tech Regulation: Security Risks And Market Dynamics
The influence of tech giants in the global economy continues to grow, raising crucial questions about how to balance sec... Read more
The Tyranny Of Instagram Interiors: Why It's Time To Break Free From Algorithm-Driven Aesthetics
Instagram has become a dominant force in shaping interior design trends, offering a seemingly endless stream of inspirat... Read more
The Data Crunch In AI: Strategies For Sustainability
Exploring solutions to the imminent exhaustion of internet data for AI training.As the artificial intelligence (AI) indu... Read more
Google Abandons Four-Year Effort To Remove Cookies From Chrome Browser
After four years of dedicated effort, Google has decided to abandon its plan to remove third-party cookies from its Chro... Read more
LinkedIn Embraces AI And Gamification To Drive User Engagement And Revenue
In an effort to tackle slowing revenue growth and enhance user engagement, LinkedIn is turning to artificial intelligenc... Read more