Indian IT Firm Mindtree's Co-founders Wage Furious Battle Against L&T's Hostile Takeover
Only in India would a hostile takeover be scripted in the language of an arranged marriage taking place within an Indian film. SN Subrahmanyan, CEO of 80-year-old Indian engineering concern L&T, said that his company's takeover offer of India's eighth-largest IT firm Mindtree had "approached the transaction from its dil (heart) and laced it with lots of pyaar (love)." Subrahmanyan went on to explain that "while its pyaar for Mindtree is one-sided like it is seen in several Hindi movies, it could turn mutual eventually, like it happens in movies and then we will live happily ever after."
What Subrahmanyan is referring to is the ice-cold reception meted out by the co-founders of India's eighth-largest IT firm Mindtree after it woke up one fine morning to the terrifying prospect of being married to the engineering and technology firm. (L&T also has an IT wing called L&T Infotech). The Judas amongst them was not a Mindtree-er but VG Siddhartha, founder of the country's most popular cafe chain, Cafe Coffee Day, who had helped the co-founders out by purchasing a 6-percent stake in 1999 that he gradually built up to 20.32 percent. Looking to pare debt in his own business, he decided to offload his stake to the first serious bidder, although co-founder and CEO Rostow Ravanan claimed that his cohort had presented him with several other eminently viable options which were ultimately ignored.
Also: PewDiePie versus T-Series silliness reveals battle for the soul of YouTube
In addition to this 20 percent from Siddhartha, L&T has said that it had already placed an offer with its brokers to buy 15 percent more of outstanding shares in the market, thereby triggering an 'open offer' as per the rules of India's stock market regulator. L&T plans on taking its stake all the way to 66 percent. (Mindtree founders currently possess 13.32 percent in their company, while institutional investors hold 50.57 percent.)
This was hardly an arranged marriage as L&T's CEO was trying to spin it -- but more of a forced one instead as is the case with unsolicited takeover offers. Yet, such is life when you initially prostrate yourself in front of the Gods of capitalism when starting out and sell your pound of flesh to start your company.
Nevertheless, the outraged cofounders of Mindtree were not going to take forced companionship lying down. One co-founder, Subroto Bagchi, promptly quit his current job as chairman of the Eastern state of Odisha's Skill Development Agency and rushed back to Bangalore. He issued a statement that would have left you imagining his firm to be a national heritage monument rather than an outfit that designs and implements IT solutions if you didn't know any better. "I must protect the Tree from people who have arrived with bulldozers and saw chains to cut it down so that in its place, they can build a shopping mall," he declared. "Mindtree has not been designed as an 'asset' to be bought and sold. It is a national resource. It has a unique culture that humanizes the idea of business," he added. (Right, of course. How could we not see that?)
Others went even further. Co-founder Krishnakumar Natarajan ludicrously labeled the whole affair to be "corporate India's #MeToo moment." Other strident messaging from the co-founders followed, citing Mindtree's unique culture, that the merger would stall all future business, that it would destroy shareholder value, that this kind of hostile behaviour would send a wrong message to entrepreneurs in the country and that Mindtree employees signed up for a 'mission' -- not a salary -- and would simply abandon L&T post the merger. They then declared that they would work on a buy-back offer, which the board (and 75 percent of investors) would first have to approve.
Finally, to rationally explain to the world why this group of 10 men felt so strongly against the merger, Natarajan, and in an effort to cool things down, explained that "Mindtree did all the early work, suffered low margins for years and now it's poised to clock top-shelf growth in the next couple of years... We tilled the land, fertilised it, put the right seeds, and now it may give us a great yield. Now if a tornado spoils it, it's not the right thing for shareholders."
THE NUMBERS BEHIND THE TREE
The fact is, Mindtree has been striving for years, unsuccessfully so, to try and crack the $1-billion-a-year revenue target. As Quartz explained, it was first supposed to do so in 2009 in a 10-year plan forged in 1999. In 2006, it extended that goal to 2012. In 2009, that plan was revised to a 5-year target to do so by 2014. It still hasn't done so. Total revenues total revenue are at $846.8 million and net profit at $88.4 million. According to some analysts, it was simply a case of a good management team underperforming. However, the past few years of changing business models and protectionism in the US has made the operating climate tough for both Mindtree and its peers.
However, while its peer group was focused on still milking the old-era businesses of infrastructure maintenance and app development five years or so ago, Mindtree did stand apart by making early headway into AI and machine learning, much in vogue across the business landscape today. Revenues form digital make up a huge 50 percent of its total pie versus just 25 percent for its cohort, making Mindtree a firm to bet on in the years ahead.
Also: Rumors of a Flipkart exit swirl around Walmart as chaos engulfs Indian e-commerce
The company could also be a very good fit for L&T Infotech, as the two firms' focus areas do not overlap. L&T's expertise is in banking, manufacturing, oil and gas, and insurance, whereas Mindtree is strong in consumer packaged goods, retail, hospitality, travel, and technology according to analysts. A merger of the two would take total revenues up to $2 billion and expand the reach and capabilities of both firms. (By contrast TCS is leagues ahead at $19 billion, Wipro at $8.4 billion, and Tech Mahindra at $4.8 billion.)
Will Mindtree be able to fend off L&T? Should L&T even bother to court and merge a company that is chronically hostile to the merger? Is it even good for L&T's business considering the free cash flow that it will suck up and the integration headaches it will cause? These are all points currently being hotly debated.
For now, however, there seems to be little prospect of love in this arranged marriage.
Related stories:
Reassessing AI Investments: What The Correction In US Megacap Tech Stocks Signals
The recent correction in US megacap tech stocks, including giants like Nvidia, Tesla, Meta, and Alphabet, has sent rippl... Read more
AI Hype Meets Reality: Assessing The Impact Of Stock Declines On Future Tech Investments
Recent declines in the stock prices of major tech companies such as Nvidia, Tesla, Meta, and Alphabet have highlighted a... Read more
Technology Sector Fuels U.S. Economic Growth In Q2
The technology sector played a pivotal role in accelerating America's economic growth in the second quarter of 2024.The ... Read more
Tech Start-Ups Advised To Guard Against Foreign Investment Risks
The US National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC) has advised American tech start-ups to be wary of foreign... Read more
Global IT Outage Threatens To Cost Insurers Billions
Largest disruption since 2017’s NotPetya malware attack highlights vulnerabilities.A recent global IT outage has cause... Read more
Global IT Outage Disrupts Airlines, Financial Services, And Media Groups
On Friday morning, a major IT outage caused widespread disruption across various sectors, including airlines, financial ... Read more