Android Case: CCI's Rs 1,337 Crore Fine Unreasonable, Google Tells NCLAT

on Thursday told the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) order imposing a fine of Rs 1,337.76 crore on it for allegedly misusing its dominant position in the ecosystem was without any inquiry or analysis.

The counsel told the bench of Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Dr Alok Srivastava, member (technical), the competition regulator’s findings that was trying to abuse its dominance by pushing Google Chrome into phones were devoid of a proper analysis.

“They (CCI) say Google apps can only be disabled. The question then is how much additional space the uninstallation will free, and if disabling slows the device. There is not an iota of finding on this. There is no inquiry or analysis on whether this has any effect on running of the device,” Google’s counsel argued.

The tech giant also said CCI itself had recognised that Google’s Mobile Application Distribution Agreement (MADA) was beneficial to Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs). Once recognised, there can be no imposition of unfair terms, OEMs are free to install any other browser on the system, and, unlike Apple devices till 2020, Google Chrome is not the default browser on systems, it submitted.

“The charge against Google is that by pre-installing Google Chrome, it is ousting somebody. The ban was imposed on UC Browser in June 2020. In the first six months that year, the app was downloaded over 104 million times. The figure is from Google Play Store. Can we even counter that there is an exclusion on account of my MADA? None of this has been considered in the CCI order,” Google told the appellate tribunal.

The bench will continue hearing the matter on February 23.

The Competition Commission of India’s (CCI’s) on October 20, 2022, penalised the tech giant and asked it to pay Rs 1337.76 crore for practices related to Android devices. Google was earlier given three months to comply with the CCI’s directive and its deadline was January 19. The tech giant then moved the on December 22, 2022, and on January 4, the appellate tribunal asked Google to pay 10 per cent of Rs 1337.76 in three weeks and posted the matter for hearing on April 3. Seeking relief, Google then moved the apex court.

After the SC refused to grant interim relief to Google on January 19, the matter was sent back to for the final order.

RECENT NEWS

JPMorgan Deploys AI Chatbot To Revolutionize Research And Productivity

JPMorgan has deployed an AI-based research analyst chatbot to enhance productivity among its workforce, with approximate... Read more

Private Equity And Banks: The Complex Web Of Leverage

Private equity has emerged as a significant force in the global financial landscape, driving substantial growth and inve... Read more

Financial Watchdog Highlights Unresolved Vulnerabilities In Shadow Banking Sector

The world’s leading financial stability watchdog has issued a warning about the unresolved vulnerabilities within the ... Read more

JPMorgan And Small Caps Lead Market Rally: A Sign Of Economic Optimism

In a week marked by strong financial performance, JPMorgan Chase & Co. reported a 25% rise in profits, and US small-... Read more

Big Banks Vs. Regional Banks: The Battle For Market Share

The financial industry is a competitive landscape where big banks and regional banks vie for market share. Each type of ... Read more

The Evolution Of Philanthropic Advisory Services In Private Banks

The landscape of philanthropic advisory services provided by private banks has undergone a significant transformation. T... Read more